• Home Page
  • Features
  • Sections
    • Academia
    • Arts
    • Business
    • Dispatches
    • Food
    • Miami
    • Nature
    • Off the Press
    • Planet Red
    • Religion
    • Souvenirs
    • Stories
    • Translation Magic
  • Dossiers
    • Guantánamo
    • Myths of Mariel
    • The Role of Intellectuals
  • About
    • FROM THE EDITOR
    • ABOUT
    • EDITORIAL TEAM & BOARD
    • Contributing Authors
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Subscribe
    • Contact

Welcome to PLANET RED! Tableaux from Communism, with Alan West-Durán and guests

May 18, 2015  By Ariana Reguant
0


A major trope of science fiction is the idea of time travel, and Planet Red will move us through time and space in a rickety spacecraft (an intergalactic bicitaxi?) of the imagination to visit current and past worlds of the communist universe. Unlike the common sci-fi scenario, we will not be able to alter the past and, hence, change the course of the future, but by travelling through the world of communism we can understand the unique flow of revolutionary time as it resists the ever quicker flows of capital. Lenin was fond of saying “time is on our side”; Stalin, on the contrary, wanted to speed up the tempo of production and felt that the USSR was running out of history, and might not catch up to the West. Whether there was too little time or more than enough, “the wheel of history” and progress had to move forward: it is this “[red] wheel of history” that Planet Red will examine, (re)creating a virtual and living archive of the future.

Cuba was once part of a brotherhood of nations that shared the common dream of building classless societies, a red universe of proletarian rule, human emancipation, free of divisions and violence, where greed, exploitation and egoism have been banished. Although the Soviet Union and its sphere of influence imploded by 1991, Cuba has firmly maintained its identity as a socialist society, with the ultimate goal —albeit in a somewhat distant future— of building communism.

How was Cuba able to outlast the Soviet bloc when everyone depicted its demise twenty-five years ago? Has Cuba learned lessons from those historical debacles? If so, what are they?

Planet Red examines the experiences of Cuba but jointly with that of the former USSR and socialist bloc, Yugoslavia, China, Vietnam, North Korea, some sixteen countries in all, scattered on all continents. It’s almost quaint to imagine that only thirty-five years ago close to one-third of the population of the globe lived under state socialist societies; more so, after the Fall of the Berlin Wall and end of the Cold War. Conventional wisdom says the West (and capitalism) won the Cold War, but the financial crash of 2008 and the wobbly recovery since then have revealed some of the vulnerabilities of capitalism (social, racial and gender inequality, stagnant wages, lack of social mobility, political gridlock, mass incarceration) and revived interest in alternatives to neo-liberalism. None of this implies nostalgia for or a return to Soviet-style one-party, centralized economies, but in examining what worked in those societies and what failed, we can gain a more complete perspective about our own times, as well as the challenges currently faced by Cuba.

Planet Red offers tableaux in motion, mirrors that reveal not only similarities but profound differences among these experiences, revealing that there were (and are) many communisms, just as there are many capitalisms. The state socialist societies of the twentieth century formed a rich variety of experiments with the arts, sciences, space travel, education, production and industry, social engineering, urban planning, and the creation of social institutions (from the Young Pioneers to chess clubs to Olympic sports to stamp collecting). In an attempt to radically change societies and human beings, these countries transformed societal norms, work habits, recreational practices, language, and culture.  Some of the results were exhilarating, others unremarkable, still others dismal or appalling.

In grappling with these histories it is important not to see them in the binaries
that carry implicit assumptions. Alexei Yurchak warns us about them: “oppression and resistance, repression and freedom, the state and the people, official economy and second economy, official culture and counterculture, totalitarian language and counter-language, public self and private self, truth and lie, reality and dissimulation, morality and corruption, and so on.” These binaries often obscure a more complete and complex portrait, of multiple causes instead of searching for a single explanation (ideas or socioeconomic indicators). Claude Lefort argues that we must see Communism in its “political, social, economic, juridical, moral, and psychic depth”.

I would add cultural depth as well; otherwise how do you understand a member of the Cuban Communist Party who is also a practicing santero?

On the one hand, Communism answered people’s need for cohesion, identity, and justice, as well as social and political stability (that is, once revolutions and/or civil wars were over or purges were concluded). Under Communism, many people led perfectly meaningful and healthy lives, built families and educated their children, lifted themselves out of poverty, and had access to culture and sports. Many Communists led exemplary lives of selflessness, courage, and sacrifice, whether it was in defense of their country (fighting fascism) or in pursuit of a better (socialist) future. But as Lefort points out, beneath the utopian rhetoric of emancipation, freedom from exploitation, and social harmony was another reality: “their love of discipline of action and thought; their love of authority, culminating in the cult of the supreme leader; their love of order, for which the system provided the criteria; and their love of uniformity, which they fulfilled already in the spectacle of unanimity.” Lefort captures admirably both the revolutionary and liberating aspects of Communism with its more conservative and authoritarian aspects, what Le Guin once called “the ambiguity of utopia”. Susan Buck-Morss has spoken of “mass-utopian projects”, and includes both capitalism and communism in her definition that include “mass sovereignty, mass production and mass culture”. This allows us to see these projects in a continuum and to not equate utopia with the gulag, or as something “unrealistic, harmful, and naive.”

Lenin with HG Wells (1920)

Lening with H.G. Wells (1920)

In her 1971 novel, The Lathe of Heaven, Ursula K. Le Guin chronicles the ordeal of George Orr, a thirty-year old draftsman whose dreams literally come true. Terrified at having this ability (he believes he caused his aunt’s death), he tries to avoid sleep by using drugs, for which he is sent to a psychiatrist, a Dr. Haber. Haber is skeptical at first, but then tries to harness Orr’s powers for his own personal advancement (successfully), but eventually he becomes more ambitious. Haber’s utopian impulses lead him to channel Orr’s dreams through the use of a machine (the Augmentor) that manipulates Orr’s brainwaves as he enters a dream state. Haber’s good intentions, however, have unintended consequences: in wanting to solve overpopulation problems, a plague is unleashed that kills 6 of the 7 billion people on the planet; in seeking to cure racial injustice all human beings end up with a skin color that is battleship gray; in trying to end war he causes an alien invasion of the planet. Orr’s dreams are the perfect utopian device since the only person (aside from Orr) who remembers what things were like before the dream becomes “effective” is Dr. Haber. Imagine what Stalin or Mao could have done with George Orr’s dreams: they would have been able to avoid civil war, party purges, class struggle, the gulag and the violence of collectivization (or erase the memory of them having occurred).

But, Le Guin, reminds us, those of us who want to play God end up being “destroyed by the lathe of heaven”. As we look at the utopian politics of our recent past, as they tried to create heaven on earth, perhaps it is not the lathe of heaven but the lathe of history that has expelled us from paradise and shattered some of our dreams.

In acknowledging the ambiguities, complexities and vibrancy of revolutionary utopias, the contributions to Planet Red will be varied, from essays to testimonies, from literary texts to vignettes. Engaging these dilemmas will involve a wealth of diverse subjects that define the Communist experience: youth festivals, films, immigration, volunteer labor, education, sexuality, music, TV programs, telenovelas, ration booklets, religion, myth, ritual, symbol, celebrations, sports, family life, cartoons, jokes and humor, tattoos, personality cults, computers, cell phones, diplobabalaos,  automobiles, even pets.

Welcome to Planet Red, a home for time’s rebels, history’s refugees, and utopia’s wayward dreamers!

 Cover image: Cuban stamp (CU-885) of 1964.
Print Friendly, PDF & EmailPDF/PRINT/EMAIL
Alan West-Durán

Alan West-Durán is Associate Professor of Cultures, Societies and Global Studies at Northeastern University. He was born in Havana and was raised in Puerto Rico. He is a poet, critic, translator, and essayist. Although popularly known for his writings on Cuban rap, he is also the author of Tropics of History: Cuba Imagined (1997) as well as many articles on literature, religion, and music. He is also the editor of the two-volume reference work Cuba (2011). He is the editor of Cuba Counterpoints’ Planet Red, and a member of its advisory board.

  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Twitter





Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



  • IN THIS SECTION

    • The North Korean Missile Crisis. By ALAN WEST-DURÁN
    • HAVANA’S CRIMINAL EXCESS ON PAY-PER-VIEW. By Alan West-Durán
    • On Neoliberal Populism. By ALAN WEST-DURÁN
    • Fidel, the Body of History. By ALAN WEST-DURÁN
    • IMAGES OF PAIN, PRIDE AND EMPIRE. By Alan West-Durán
  • Editorial Committee

    Jossianna Arroyo (U. Texas-Austin)
    Albert Sergio Laguna (Yale U.)
    Ana López (Tulane U.)
    Jacqueline Loss (U. Conn)
    Lillian Manzor (U. Miami)
    José Pineda (Anthro Journeys)
    Eliana Rivero (U. Az)
    Alan West-Durán (Northeastern U.)
    Esther Whitfield (Brown U.)

  • International Advisory Board

    RUTH BEHAR (U Michigan, U.S.)
    JOAQUIN BORGES-TRIANA (Juventud Rebelde, Cuba)
    LARRY CATÁ BACKER (Pennsylvania State U., U.S.)
    KAREN DUBINKSY (Queens U, Canada)
    ALEX GIL (Columbia U., U.S.)
    TED HENKEN (Baruch Col, US)
    HENRY ERIC HERNANDEZ (U de las Artes, Cuba)
    ANNA CRISTINA PERTIERRA (UWestern Sydney, Australia)

  • Tags

    Afro Cuba book review Camagüey cinema connectivity Cuban America diplomacy economy education Europe event review Fidel Castro food government Havana history ideology inequality intellectuals interview language law literature Marti mass media medicine memory Miami migration museums music poetry politics race relations religion Santiago science sports technology travel Trump U.S. Cuban relations visual arts women youth


Cuba Counterpoints © 2015-2018 All Rights Reserved -- ISSN 2380-0917
Back to top